CNATRAINST 3500.3
28 June 2001
in the hierarchy of measures. The criticality of the ability to "drill
down" using the cockpit chart must be considered and for that reason
if there is any question concerning whether or not there will be
impact above or below from a change, that question should be
escalated. The following diagram depicts a typical change flow.
COCKPIT CHART REVISION PROCESS
FLOW
Flow representation of the cockpit chart revision process for CNATRA Training Wings
IDENTIFY
TRAWINGS
IMPLEMENT
NEED FOR
ACKNOWLEDGE
CHANGE
CHANGE
(if required)
DISAPPROVE
CNATRA/
NOTIFY
APPROVE/
APPROVE
CFT-2
ALL
DISAPPROVE
TRAWINGS
FORWARD
REVIEW
PROPOSED
CHANGES
NOTIFY
OTHER
AFFECTED
CFT-1
CFT
CFTs
&/or
COORDINATION
&
CFT-3
(as required)
IMPLEMENT
(as required)
REVIEW
APPROVE/
CHANGE
DISAPPROVE
NAPT
PROPOSAL
The need for changes or revisions to cockpit charts may be begun at any level.
This flow diagram should be entered at the appropriate level to assure that all
impacts of the proposed change(s) are considered.
17
Previous Page
