Figure 7-1 - P-8120046
 Click here to make tpub.com your Home Page Page Title: Figure 7-1 Back | Up | Next

 Web www.tpub.com

Home

Information Categories
Aerographer
Automotive
Aviation
Construction
Diving
Draftsman
Engineering
Electronics
Food and Cooking
Logistics
Math
Medical
Music
Nuclear Fundamentals
Photography
Religion

STUDENT GUIDE
available for analysis and computations is much less, and "UPDATING" the time to a given
point becomes even more critical. There are other changes to the "visual picture" as well.
7.4.2.1. The equations and techniques used for basic fix analysis were introduced in UNIT 5 (T-
34 VNAV). As with T-34 VNAV flight, analysis follows the fix and is based on error over time
flown. This process requires a base indicated air speed is flown equating to 300 TAS. Prior to
low-level entry, compute the correct base IAS by using the ram air temperature and the
"Temperature vs. IAS" table located in the In-flight Guide (Figure 7-1) for the T-1A. T-39
conversions are included in the PCL.
7.4.2.2. While initial sources of wind information include the base weather shop and Flight
Service, there are two methods of wind determination that provide information regarding the
actual winds affecting the aircraft. These methods are visual and track analysis, and in both
require application the "Fix, Analyze, Compensate, Correct and Update" process.
7.4.3. Visual Analysis
TEMPERATURE VS. IAS
(FOR 300 TAS)
7.4.3.1. Perhaps the quickest way to estimate wind is
through visual analysis. There are several visual cues
+44
- +53
285
enabling accurate wind analysis. Flying at altitudes as
+34
- +43
290
low as 500 feet AGL, these cues will typically be closer
+24
- +33
295
to the aircraft than they were for T-34 sorties. This
+14
- +23
300
equates to both a more accurate visual analysis as well
+04
- +13
305
as the aircraft being closer to the perceived wind's
-06
- +03
310
altitude. While the most frequently used of visual cue is
smoke (Figure. 7-2), other cues include water effects,
Figure 7-1
windsocks, flags and foliage. Students may use visual
analysis as a source for wind information or for
supporting track analysis However,
students must still separate winds computed using
visual analysis into component winds. The guide in
figure 7-5 illustrates the separation of components.
7.5. TRACK ANALYSIS
7.5.1. While track analysis requires more time for computation, it is typically more accurate and
provides specific wind components for compensation. Additionally, this method can compensate
for some of the effects of errors due to mission planning inaccuracies.
7.5.2. Good track analysis begins by following the "FIX, ANALYSE, COMPENSATE,
CORRECT, UPDATE" path. What follows is an in-depth discussion of each component and its
application at 300 KTAS and 500 feet AGL.
7-3

 Integrated Publishing, Inc. 6230 Stone Rd, Unit Q Port Richey, FL 34668 Phone For Parts Inquiries: (727) 493-0744 Google +