CNATRAINST 1542.153A
12 March 2004
(d) Planned profile, contingencies, and ORM
considerations.
(4) Debriefing
(a) After each sortie, the SI shall critique the
IUT's or student's performance using cause/effect analysis,
particularly with respect to the CTS.
(b) The mission's complexity and IUT's or student's
progress will govern the time required for the debrief.
(c) The SI shall provide the IUT or student with a
copy of the new ATS, and may provide a copy of the sortie's
ATF/ITF.
b.
Emergency Procedures (EP) Briefing and Training
(1) EP training builds the IUT's and student's confidence
in the aircraft. The IP shall conduct emergency procedures
training on all dual aircraft sorties, either on the ground or
in the aircraft. Correct procedural deficiencies through
additional instruction and study assignments.
(2) Incorporate emergency procedures training into
simulator sorties when practical; however, instructional block
objectives take precedence.
(3) Grade the IUT's or student's overall EP knowledge and
performance under Emergency Procedures.
6.
Mission Grading Procedures and Evaluation Policies
a. General Grading and Evaluation Policy. Course Training
Standards (CTSs) listed in this instruction and the Maneuver
Item Files (MIFs) are minimum stage/phase completion standards
per maneuver. CTSs/MIFs are designed to allow for minimum
performance in a specific area with the understanding that
performance above the minimum CTS/MIF will offset the weak area.
I-13